16th September 2013, 10:40 PM
(This post was last modified: 16th September 2013, 10:46 PM by Unitof1.)
Quote:call them what you will ..... should be taking landscape into account according to advice from EH and encapsulted in PPS5....if they are not they should be challenged as to why notfor what point. The "site" is defined in the planning application. You are just supporting their only point of existence which is exactly the same as that of geophysics which is that they can somehow reduce the expense of archaeology to the client. We don't give a monkeys for any curators PM abilities. These PMs are unsubstantiated by evaluated by trench- and up themselves and we lose money from it and have to pay to support them on top of it all. No one needs them.
Reason: your past is my past