Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Computers taking archaeology jobs away
#1
Okay, title is tongue-in-cheek. Have I missed discussion on this, or did it pass under the radar?

https://www.stfc.ac.uk/3557.aspx
Reply
#2
Sounds good, though I question their implied basic asumption that we can somehow know where previously unknown archaeological sites are?? Though I agree once can map at what depths previously excavated remains are at, how deep overlying hillwash/sedimentation is likely to be and how deep modern damage penetrates. Still wont tell you where that nationally important Neolithic town is hiding.

"there are few locations in Britain where an absence of archaeology on a Sites and Monuments Record (SMR) represents an actual absence of archaeological remains" (Powlesland 2003, 275)
Reply
#3
It's just going to make that 'surprise' Roman town even more painful for the overconfident and poorly advised construction company - but I'm not allowed to comment }Smile
Reply
#4
Stick absence of evidence up your algorithm.

Aren't they basically liars? For it to be "big" data they would have had to fed my context sheets into their ponderous algorithm and apart from the fact that most of my sheets are illegible and that I have not archived them, there is the question about copyrights (don't bother worrying about my illness). At best they have got some meta data and found a way to make their big computer map light up with a limited pallet range. I imagine that what they are trying to confuse everybody with is that the big BGS map is the big data. Thing is if you look at BGS sample density it has not much to write home about. Can anybody be bothered to wonder what their predictive algorithm does with the terms "there be badgers" and "probable post hole". I always took it as read that every site must have these and that they are only reported to Defra and the heritage nannies if they are not there but when we still reserve the right use the word "possible" if questioned in a court of law. Apart from a very sad webpage arent these people refuges from the email tapping world. Their contacts web page leads to this claim to fame, note the use of "worked". This appears to have been the CEO. https://plus.google.com/101475383433139483881/about

Is Democrata dead? Long live the Republic.
.....nature was dead and the past does not exist
Reply
#5
Marc Berger Wrote:Stick absence of evidence up your algorithm......Aren't they basically liars? .

lol

Pretty much - what a load of over-engineered cobblers - to borrow the military term - ' Mark 1 Eye-ball wins every time'.....or should that be trowel?
Reply
#6
Unfortunately, some applications of 'Big Data' do work (e.g. American police forces use it quite successfully to work out where/what crimes are likely to be committed on a day-to-day basis, down to particular neighbourhoods/streets), but I can't imagine how it could work in Archaeology
Reply
#7
The American police presumably have not quite successfully yet big dataed their shooting of innocent people.

PS I claim big dataed in this context as a new phrase and spelling.
.....nature was dead and the past does not exist
Reply
#8
It's all very well and good but the trouble is with this archaeology is that it was created by humans. And humans have the annoying thing of being so damned unpredictable with their activities and lives and dying and such... So whilst you can to some degree 'predict' where activity will have happened, at the same time you really cannot.
Reply
#9
Since computers can't think, their algorithm-generated predictions are only as good as the data they have to chew on! There be Planning challenges in this Brave New World.

Anyone remember when the map of Roman Britain bore an uncanny resemblance to the motorway network? Big Grin
Reply
#10
You can automate data collection, but not interpretation.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Plenty of jobs going......... monty 12 9,028 10th September 2015, 05:43 PM
Last Post: P Prentice
  Are Standards in field Archaeology Slipping Wax 90 30,475 23rd June 2015, 12:41 PM
Last Post: Dinosaur
  Wessex Archaeology Recruits a Teddy Bear BAJR 10 8,208 24th December 2014, 06:41 PM
Last Post: monty
  Tay and Fife Archaeology Conference Doug 16 8,790 15th November 2014, 01:04 AM
Last Post: Doug
  Archaeology in Schools Dirty Boy 8 4,408 28th September 2014, 09:04 PM
Last Post: vulpes
  Jobs in British Archaeology 2013-14 Doug 24 10,750 24th July 2014, 03:25 PM
Last Post: P Prentice
  Who would BAJarites award a "Queen's Birthday" honour to for services to archaeology? Wax 13 6,122 19th June 2014, 01:51 PM
Last Post: P Prentice
  Job adverts taking the p**s RedEarth 23 9,471 9th June 2014, 06:33 PM
Last Post: Mike.T.
  Complete University Guide 2014 - Archaeology kevin wooldridge 2 2,271 14th May 2014, 03:00 PM
Last Post: pdurdin
  Blogging Archaeology eBook- FREE Doug 1 2,039 26th April 2014, 05:19 PM
Last Post: Doug

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)