Cross-sector approach to capitalise on archaeology in Scotland

[Unitof1]

if anybody says that list of tripe reminds them of the Ahnenerbe I think that they should be shot and then it should be pointed out that they have managed not mention anybody called bruce which proves that they are british. What I want to know is why has key recomendation 5 got 8 more key recomendations when all the other key recomendations dont have any extra subclauses to arrange.

I also wonder if

1. Archaeology in Scotland has enormous potential. Many, many talented and committed people are involved in different ways. A great deal of innovative work is taking place.

is in any way a key recomendation. And could the "Many, many" be shortened to manys or is it manies.

2. The sector would benefit from input from Historic
Scotland to provide more co-ordinated leadership, real partnerships and
effective policy. There is a need for a long-term strategy for archaeological
resources within Scotland involving all stakeholders that is aligned with the
overall desired outcomes and vision for the historic environment.

Did scotish heritage nationalists really write that its like they are taking control. So dominant, shoulders back, stake hold in., So it turns out that scotish histryonics have been crap all along.

3.This long-term strategy should, in the first instance, be developed by Historic Scotland, on behalf of Scottish Ministers, working closely with stakeholders and partners within the sector as well as those who ?consume?
archaeology. Historic Scotland is ideally placed to carry out this leadership role because their staff possess the depth of knowledge, experience and specific archaeological skills required.

I though key note 2 had sorted out the long term stratergy

4. The long-term strategy should be developed in the context of the wider review of Historic Environment policy and the outlook for public expenditure

there it is again long term thingy, couldnt it have just been one key recomendations with possibly a few sub clauses a bit like 5.

Bloody hell 5 is all about the blo0dy long term stratergy what is a bloody long term stratergy is what I want to know and how long is long-cant be bothered to read the 8 points because they cant be as inportant as the kep points.

6. HS should establish an Archaeology Forum for Scotland to provide advice
in the development and implementation of the strategy and on funding
priorities. A key ongoing task for the forum could be to ensure that the
strategy is kept live by keeping up-to-date with latest research in Scotland
and elsewhere. The forum could be committee in format and size.

oh good will there be tea and biscuits I like the more co-ordinated leadership, real partnerships and effective policy shown with the "The forum could be committee in format and size" I like a bit of could. oh beat me with it

7. boldocks to the long term stratergy its all about 2015! thank salmonds it could have a forum by then and it just might be committe sized which is about this big and they just might be able to suppotrt this other committe of people from other commitiess with the name scotland in them
fcuk 8 its now got an overall stratergy is that an overall stratergy over the long term stratergy its surly going to need another committee butty no its a strong leader

9. At the same time HS should consider how the wealth of archaeological expertise within the organisation could be used most effectively and the scope for a rolling programme of secondments to and from the organisation.

plwew even though I fully endorse the hitler view of your archaeology is anybodies I am just going to put it down that 9 is not a sentance or two possibly a gerund or that google should have a scotish nationalist git translator.

I dont really care about 10 but its probably the one with most pensions in it and does involve nazi gold sold by english gorden brown banks that rightfully belongs to the scotish peoples which was descovered when archaeologists undertook excavations before drilling for oil was undertaken .

and as for key point 11 I dont give a toss about stupid report writing and whats 1 year got to do with the overall long term stratergy which presunably will be a committie or five forums under a leader who is stronge and presumably seconded from somewhere.

All in all the overall long term stratergy is to try and get some lazy gits to produce their reports this year for which they have all ready done a runner with the excavation money and then its 2015 get some bunting out and celebrated archaeology in a scotish way which is better than celebrating scotish in an archaeology way or have I got the long term stratergy the wrong way round which is to say bact t0o front sorry hopefuly you have the overall picture.