Hello tmsarch
sorry about the link. It was just to a planning application document picked out at random. Here is the form that it was on http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/appPDF/W3520Form004_england_en.pdf
found here
http://www.midsuffolk.gov.uk/PlanningAndBuilding/PlanningServices/Application+Forms/Application+Forms.htm
I would like to see archaeology mentioned on this form. I find this form used in many districts
1. Yes on the basis that archaeology does not need council curators as far as I am concerned. I want them gone so that we can get on with doing archaeology without them and their cost. Mostly I want the archaeology to be undertaken pre determination. I think that the curators drag it into post descion too much. I don think anybody losing their job is good.
2. I see a relatively straight forward one based on objections to planning applications with the planning officers following planning guidance?s, local plans, political influence, local concern. Much like they do on choosing brick colours and types
3. The way that it is mentioned
HE7.1 In decision-making12 local planning authorities should seek to identify and assess
the particular significance of any element of the historic environment that may be
affected by the relevant proposal (including by development affecting the setting of
a heritage asset) taking account of:
(i) evidence provided with the application
its the evidence provided with the application which I think should come from commercial sources and not be paid for through pre application inquiry fees
HE6.1 Local planning authorities should require an applicant to provide a description of
the significance of the heritage assets affected and the contribution of their setting
to that significance. The level of detail should be proportionate to the importance
of the heritage asset and no more than is sufficient to understand the potential
impact of the proposal on the significance of the heritage asset.
and
HE6.2 This information together with an assessment of the impactof the proposal should
be set out in the application(within the design and access statement when this is
required) as part of the explanation of the design concept. It should detail the
sources that have been considered and the expertise that has been consulted.
I dont see why I acting for the applicant cannot make recommendations to the planning officer or the planning committee
never been to mid sommer sulfolk in my life nor have any intension
sorry about the link. It was just to a planning application document picked out at random. Here is the form that it was on http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/appPDF/W3520Form004_england_en.pdf
found here
http://www.midsuffolk.gov.uk/PlanningAndBuilding/PlanningServices/Application+Forms/Application+Forms.htm
I would like to see archaeology mentioned on this form. I find this form used in many districts
1. Yes on the basis that archaeology does not need council curators as far as I am concerned. I want them gone so that we can get on with doing archaeology without them and their cost. Mostly I want the archaeology to be undertaken pre determination. I think that the curators drag it into post descion too much. I don think anybody losing their job is good.
2. I see a relatively straight forward one based on objections to planning applications with the planning officers following planning guidance?s, local plans, political influence, local concern. Much like they do on choosing brick colours and types
3. The way that it is mentioned
HE7.1 In decision-making12 local planning authorities should seek to identify and assess
the particular significance of any element of the historic environment that may be
affected by the relevant proposal (including by development affecting the setting of
a heritage asset) taking account of:
(i) evidence provided with the application
its the evidence provided with the application which I think should come from commercial sources and not be paid for through pre application inquiry fees
HE6.1 Local planning authorities should require an applicant to provide a description of
the significance of the heritage assets affected and the contribution of their setting
to that significance. The level of detail should be proportionate to the importance
of the heritage asset and no more than is sufficient to understand the potential
impact of the proposal on the significance of the heritage asset.
and
HE6.2 This information together with an assessment of the impactof the proposal should
be set out in the application(within the design and access statement when this is
required) as part of the explanation of the design concept. It should detail the
sources that have been considered and the expertise that has been consulted.
I dont see why I acting for the applicant cannot make recommendations to the planning officer or the planning committee
never been to mid sommer sulfolk in my life nor have any intension
Reason: your past is my past