28th April 2011, 03:33 PM
Comarch Wrote:but unless the material caters for all, and is written in various ways for different audiences, the dry, technical, 'grey literature' will not surfice. This is not dumbing down
dry and technical is what is commonly churned out the end of the process but what i want to see is the field documentation and drawings on line, the specialist reports on line so that everybody can see them and not have to wait years and years and years if ever to see a report. clearly there would be temptation for extraneous interpretation which might sometimes be misguided or misplaced but equally the work of the people who excavated it wouldnt be wasted
interpretting the results for a diverse audience is a skilled and time consuming task which should be properly funded and reported but where better than the www?