27th April 2011, 06:32 PM
prentise I think that you will find that archaeologists (if they exist) competing against each other for the last scraps of archaeology will come under a different high noon set of rules instead of the nonsensical one that we have now.
possibly Shadowjack as a consequence of my daytime drinking habits and my suspicions of hostys Post deleting habits we are currently robbed of my last post specifically to you on this thread. I thought that I had a certain amount of sanctity in this thread but it appears that I have hit a nerve. Eh pha come-ae ssta (gives him grounds to ban me for funny language) (yet again)
This is the paradigm that I am suggesting that you shadowjack need to get out of. Those companies do not have a group of archaeologists working together-that has been my contention for a very long time.
It appears shadowjack that you have no problem imagining that I unitof1, a sole trader, can hold on to my copyright-but that it would be very messy in the real world of the company (and that might need a bit of qualification in the world of charity trusts).
You shadowjack give a few out of many examples where in the world that archaeologists have been brought up in, where who had what bit of copyright would make what it appears that we do- a bit messy. I agree. And to further add grist to the mill, would like to add, what do I get out of it, me the wondrous sole trader, a sole trader who goes around masquerading as an archaeologist, who holds on to the copyright. But does that make the company model right.
The answer so far to holding onto copyright is
NOTHING
Nobody has given me a monkey. I take that to mean they are not giving monkies to the company archaeolgists apparently working as a group (lets not call them the beetles but I would like to use them as an example in copyright)
Is it because people working in archaeology dont understand, don’t know how it works or can they get away with it because they don’t need my wonderful copyright.
Its like I am living in my own museum. Here am I surrounded by all my context sheets. But nobody comes to see them.
I must admit I have never been forced to look at anybody else’s. It appears Dino might look at some from the 70ties but only out of his sense of wanting to “publish properly” the “whole” site.”!””!”
I do though reference a few reports in my scheme of works to make it look like I am a real archaeologist.
what ever real is hay broody
possibly Shadowjack as a consequence of my daytime drinking habits and my suspicions of hostys Post deleting habits we are currently robbed of my last post specifically to you on this thread. I thought that I had a certain amount of sanctity in this thread but it appears that I have hit a nerve. Eh pha come-ae ssta (gives him grounds to ban me for funny language) (yet again)
Quote:[SIZE=3]But on a practical level...if you have a group of archaeologists, working for a company,
[/SIZE]
This is the paradigm that I am suggesting that you shadowjack need to get out of. Those companies do not have a group of archaeologists working together-that has been my contention for a very long time.
It appears shadowjack that you have no problem imagining that I unitof1, a sole trader, can hold on to my copyright-but that it would be very messy in the real world of the company (and that might need a bit of qualification in the world of charity trusts).
You shadowjack give a few out of many examples where in the world that archaeologists have been brought up in, where who had what bit of copyright would make what it appears that we do- a bit messy. I agree. And to further add grist to the mill, would like to add, what do I get out of it, me the wondrous sole trader, a sole trader who goes around masquerading as an archaeologist, who holds on to the copyright. But does that make the company model right.
The answer so far to holding onto copyright is
NOTHING
Nobody has given me a monkey. I take that to mean they are not giving monkies to the company archaeolgists apparently working as a group (lets not call them the beetles but I would like to use them as an example in copyright)
Is it because people working in archaeology dont understand, don’t know how it works or can they get away with it because they don’t need my wonderful copyright.
Its like I am living in my own museum. Here am I surrounded by all my context sheets. But nobody comes to see them.
I must admit I have never been forced to look at anybody else’s. It appears Dino might look at some from the 70ties but only out of his sense of wanting to “publish properly” the “whole” site.”!””!”
I do though reference a few reports in my scheme of works to make it look like I am a real archaeologist.
what ever real is hay broody
Reason: your past is my past