23rd April 2011, 03:37 PM
65 squids a pop round my way. And thats the price they thought up first time round. The HER has to cost something, the curators as well. The polluter is supposed to pay for it all. The councils have started this ?500+ transparancy thing http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/...r-500-list. I have tried tickling out whos pay for what but I can only imagine that the costs for archaeology will get more apparent and push the prices up.
Quote:a charge makes sense if the re-user will be making money as a result, which is not the case here. -polluter pays are you saying that there should be a development tax..
Reason: your past is my past