Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Update on the Priddy Circle Case
#1
The archaeological community is looking for guidance from the case of a Mendip landowner into the penalty that may be imposed for damaging historic sites, a court was told.


Taunton Crown Court heard that Roger Maxwell Penny, 73, who admits destroying part of the Priddy Circles ancient earthworks, dating back to 3,000BC, would like to do what he can to put the damage right.


David Maunder, for English Heritage, proposed that the work be done or supervised using Mr Penny's resources "under the eye of English Heritage".


The judge said the simplest way was for Mr Penny to agree to permit English Heritage to enter his land for up to 18 months to carry out archaeological works to reinstate the area.


http://www.thisissomerset.co.uk/Guidance...story.html


Hmmmm so we teh public pay for the work then?
Reply
#2
Until relatively recently, the farmer at Castlethorn in West Lothian had 4x4 events through the middle of the hill fort. They now skirt the centre following intervention by Historic Scotland ;o)
Contrary to the Land Reform Act here in Scotland, he chases people off 'his' hills with varied threats.
The land is rented form Lord Torphichen.
Reply
#3
I'm guessing though that the line 'at the landowners resources', infer he will be paying for the restorative works....and his lawyer has clearly spotted that a 'final' situation where minimal damage is observable, might mitigate the level of the inevitable fine.
With peace and consolation hath dismist, And calm of mind all passion spent...
Reply
#4
I've recently been looking at the 1882 Ancient Monuments Act, and it is surprising how reluctant the state has always been to punish those 'defacing an ancient monument'. On the question of fines, the low levels set may reflect the difficulty of setting a monetary value on something that is literally invaluable.
Reply
#5
Mr Penny has been fined only ?2,500, but has to pay costs of ?7,500. Furthermore he has agreed to pay (which reduced his fine) for 'repairs' and 'other mitigation works' to an estimated cost of ?38,000.

www.thisissomerset.co.uk/Priddy-Circles-destruction-lands-businessman-48/story-17189439-detail/story.html
Reply
#6
I think this is a case of justice done and justice seen to be done....although a small amendment to the 1979 Act allowing English Heritage to seize a heritage asset where evidence of criminal neglect could be proved. might be a more effective deterrent to future offenders.
With peace and consolation hath dismist, And calm of mind all passion spent...
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Excavation archives as case studies pdurdin 34 17,564 29th May 2015, 12:44 AM
Last Post: GnomeKing
  Build your own Stone Circle - the downsing way BAJR 5 2,332 4th October 2013, 10:01 AM
Last Post: barkingdigger
  IfA update on Self Employed and Volunteers BAJR 11 4,044 15th August 2013, 11:12 PM
Last Post: Wax
  IfA and the Royal Charter - update on progress kevin wooldridge 91 20,734 19th July 2013, 10:44 PM
Last Post: Unitof1
  Update on aerial photography suitable for YACs and schools etc John Wells 3 1,761 25th January 2013, 02:26 PM
Last Post: John Wells
  New Henge and/or timber circle at Stonehenge the invisible man 9 3,506 28th July 2010, 03:39 PM
Last Post: Greyfriar
  Unionisation - UPDATE BAJR Host 39 9,862 25th April 2010, 10:54 AM
Last Post: BAJR
  Salary Benchmarking Project - Update BAJR Host 23 8,224 25th January 2008, 12:57 PM
Last Post: m300572
  update on LG pay award voice of reason 1 1,099 6th June 2007, 01:17 PM
Last Post: voice of reason
  Archaeological wages - an update. kevin wooldridge 3 1,844 19th November 2005, 03:34 PM
Last Post: BAJR Host

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)