1st December 2005, 01:52 AM
My understanding of what you said was rather different. You say
"I see those BAJR highlighted statements comments were made by named on-line members of those bodies - what would the un-named mass membership say off-line? that was my comment! Hosty, you do yourself no favours. Debate honourably or not at all!!"
My understanding is that you said:
?Maybe the IFA,CBA and Britarch have it right when they say, (off-list)that bajr is populated by anarchist idiots! Please prove that isn't so. Hosty, bollocks is bollocks and your position on this is full of it!!!!.
Could you clarify if you have any evidence that that either statement is correct.
Peter
"I see those BAJR highlighted statements comments were made by named on-line members of those bodies - what would the un-named mass membership say off-line? that was my comment! Hosty, you do yourself no favours. Debate honourably or not at all!!"
My understanding is that you said:
?Maybe the IFA,CBA and Britarch have it right when they say, (off-list)that bajr is populated by anarchist idiots! Please prove that isn't so. Hosty, bollocks is bollocks and your position on this is full of it!!!!.
Could you clarify if you have any evidence that that either statement is correct.
Peter