Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Predictions for 2016...
#28
Crocodile Wrote:Granted the Level descriptions are more detailed but terms like project officer are not meaningless. A company paying L4 rates for employees it titles as PO's is either underpaying its PO's or is misleading other parties, county archaeologists, consultants, clients etc, about the level of experience being employed to run a site.

I have never seen a BAJR level grade referred to in a Written Scheme of Investigation, I have seen plenty of WSI's that say that a site will be, run by or monitered by an experienced archaeological project officer. It can't be reduced to a simple matter of nomenclature. It's either a matter of poor pay, or a matter misleading job titles, designed to mislead concerned parties about the experience and competence of the individuals being employed to run sites. It's a matter of poor pay or it's a matter of poor standards.
the standard is and always has been the one you can get away with
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Predictions for 2016... - by BAJR - 24th March 2016, 06:42 PM
Predictions for 2016... - by BAJR - 29th March 2016, 05:35 PM
Predictions for 2016... - by BAJR - 29th March 2016, 05:38 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  BAJR 12 Predictions for the next ten years BAJR 4 4,043 19th March 2010, 11:17 PM
Last Post: GnomeKing
  The Future of Archaeology: 12 Expert Predictions for the Decade Ahead BAJR 6 4,096 19th March 2010, 07:25 PM
Last Post: BAJR

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)