7th July 2013, 05:05 PM
RedEarth Wrote:Of course, no one who took a view contrary to the IfA could be accused of doing anything to protect their own position/bank accounts.
Why not? Thats the whole point of commercial archaeology, to make money. Its just that one group of money-makers are attempting to unilaterally restrict the rights of the rest to do the same in an open and competative environment, tender by tender. If they're so good they shouldn't be scared of the competition