7th April 2011, 01:52 PM
Bigpicture Wrote:To add to Marcus's point, HE6.1 of PPS5 states:
"Local planning authorities should require an applicant to provide a description of the significance of the heritage assets affected and the contribution of their setting to that significance. The level of detail should be proportionate to the importance of the heritage asset and no more than is sufficient to understand the potential impact of the proposal on the significance of the heritage asset. As a minimum the relevant historic environment record should have been consulted....."
True and this makes an interesting point. In Murkeyside (and others) has effective closure of the HER created a barrier to 'growth' as it is now impossible to comply with PPS5?
D. Vader
Senior Consultant
Vader Maull & Palpatine
Archaeological Consultants
A tremor in the Force. The last time I felt it was in the presence of Tony Robinson.
Senior Consultant
Vader Maull & Palpatine
Archaeological Consultants
A tremor in the Force. The last time I felt it was in the presence of Tony Robinson.