29th June 2010, 06:19 PM
I think the suggested IFA rates are going in the right direction but the BAJR rates seem to be a better reflection of reality.
Has anyone done a survey of what companies are actually paying their staff or is this one of those areas where companies are reluctant to give information away as it is commercially sensitive?
Does the IFA monitor the rates of pay of registered organisations?
My experience of rates of pay comes from the jobs I have done and those that are advertised which are generally in keeping with BAJR rates. However the rumour mill does suggest that there are companies out there who are paying peanuts.
I gave up long ago comparing archaeological wages with those of other industries as it makes me weep.:face-crying: We are really a very long way from what we should be paid especially those in project management positions.
Has anyone done a survey of what companies are actually paying their staff or is this one of those areas where companies are reluctant to give information away as it is commercially sensitive?
Does the IFA monitor the rates of pay of registered organisations?
My experience of rates of pay comes from the jobs I have done and those that are advertised which are generally in keeping with BAJR rates. However the rumour mill does suggest that there are companies out there who are paying peanuts.
I gave up long ago comparing archaeological wages with those of other industries as it makes me weep.:face-crying: We are really a very long way from what we should be paid especially those in project management positions.