18th November 2009, 01:06 PM
Actually - back to the (sort of) main topic.....
I think you're point is that people at the 'sharp end' are more able to appreciate the problems that decisions made within IfA might have on them. So surely that completely refutes the original theme of this thread. Surely this demonstrates that the people it affects (ROs and their staff) should have a greater say, not no say, in the decisions that affect them.....
I think you're point is that people at the 'sharp end' are more able to appreciate the problems that decisions made within IfA might have on them. So surely that completely refutes the original theme of this thread. Surely this demonstrates that the people it affects (ROs and their staff) should have a greater say, not no say, in the decisions that affect them.....