1st April 2008, 08:56 PM
no - it is a site which has been very badly served by almost all those involved in the past.
Surely as archaeologists we should be interested in what might be found about what is a remarkable site, landscape and period, rather than snidely bitching away from the side? or would that be too grown up?
Surely as archaeologists we should be interested in what might be found about what is a remarkable site, landscape and period, rather than snidely bitching away from the side? or would that be too grown up?