Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How can adequate development planning occur when...
#1
How can adequate development planning occur when some important commercial sites are neither listed in HERs, OASIS or any other publicly accessible record?

This is no trivial matter - i have personal knowledge of at least 4 non-trivial sites, each with some 'difficulties' in initially planning approval, one nearly 10 years old, excavated under full commercial contracts and planning legislation, for which there is no Report, no deposited Archive, no digital listing, and (rather shockingly) no County Council listing or HER entry.

A 'Desk-Based' survey for the areas would suggest no known archaeology for any subsequent development. Sure, if the friendly Mounty remembers the work, and happens to have time to speak to you, they might remember that some work was done, and perhaps even the most broad archaeological narrative. However this is utterly sub-standard for planning commercial risk, archaeological potential, and in PREPARING ADEQUATE METHODS for heritage mitigation. We need plans. We need assemblages. We need dates. WE NEED THE DETAILS.

Even when a Mounty might have provided this kind of input, there is no guarantee they will, for a variety of reasons (eg generally not wanting to get involved with problems, overworked/under-funded, simple Council power games etc).
In at least one other case, the lack of an updated HER record meant that a 'significant' site was discovered in an area which had been judged 'low significance', but would have been considered 'high' had the previous adjacent excavation (with no public record) had been factored in. The Mounty said nothing. I have personal experience of exactly the same - different County/Company/Site, but same old story...

I am very much first-in-line to defend our Public Services and County Council colleagues, and i put the blame firmly in the hands of the Commercial sector, who still seem to think that County Councils, Museums, and Public Archives will just clean up their mess, essentially for free!

But, this is just not good enough. The Commercial sector will do nothing unless the CCs get much MUCH tougher...i don't see much prospect of that, so what do we do ?

ps: please please please do not mention the Charted Institute of FA...that really will not help us, not unless most of the executive body is severely shaken up...at every turn where the Institute of FA should have helped, it has proved a closed door, dead-end, and total waste of ones time + ink.
Reply
#2
The first thing that I would say gnomeking is don’t worry about it unless you have a way to make any money out of your concerns. Do you own any of the archaeology from these sites? I suspect that those that do own the archaeology from these sites do not care and or have a financial disincentive to take them any further. They own it, not your problem.

To take cases like these further a few other things need to change before your view of what commercial archaeology is can be straightened. Privatise the museums, get rid of the archaeological officer post in the planning advice system and make all archaeological consideration pre application and in no way subject to post application conditions. Oh and stop using Council HERs hopefully they will close them down and let museums and other bodies collate information that is thoroughly irrelevant to archaeological field evaluation
.....nature was dead and the past does not exist
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What would eh know about buying land for development? Marc Berger 11 1,834 5th December 2016, 01:10 PM
Last Post: Dinosaur
  General permitted development rights consultation historic building 28 7,517 17th October 2015, 08:27 PM
Last Post: Marc Berger
  short course in planning and heritage ? BAJR 1 751 7th November 2014, 06:09 PM
Last Post: BAJR
  Should an archaeologist recommend a development in the planning application comments Marc Berger 48 7,410 1st July 2014, 04:45 PM
Last Post: Marc Berger
  Single Context Planning and GIS.. BAJR 1 760 6th April 2014, 09:02 PM
Last Post: BAJR
  Contninuing Professional Development Log Wax 19 2,956 10th January 2014, 02:03 PM
Last Post: Dinosaur
  Development next to the Prittlewell burial site redexile 10 2,407 1st November 2013, 01:05 PM
Last Post: Kajemby
  Planning Permission to be relaxed (again) VGC 14 2,736 25th March 2013, 09:49 AM
Last Post: Dinosaur
  Historic Environment Law: Planning, listed buildings, monuments, conservation areas a BAJR 3 1,100 3rd January 2013, 03:21 PM
Last Post: kevin wooldridge
  Refuse planning permission for houses on Wincobank Hill BAJR 22 3,875 5th July 2012, 11:33 PM
Last Post: Unitof1

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)