4th January 2006, 11:13 AM
All the units/companies I've worked for had some sort of quality control or editing (whether it was enshrined formally in QM or QA or otherwise). As sniper says, the more specialist the report is, the less comment you are likely to get about the thrust of the report, rather than just the gramar or spilling [sic]. I have tended to find in my current job the review is quite thorough as another archaeologist reads the report then it's reviewed by the PM who invariably is not an archaeologist. This tends to cover the technical bits of the report and also making sure its readable and doesn't assume too much knowledge, which is good for the general readship.
Of the Clan Sutton
Of the Clan Sutton