27th January 2013, 08:13 PM
Yeaaay!
I think we have it cracked. and there we can leave it.
the question is to fill it in or not to fill it in.
The data is there to use or not to use.
Though I still don't know what the data tells us... though that said, it does what archaeologists do best ( or used to before cutbacks) collect data that we don't know is useful yet.
You see how Doug can reply if asked questions in a less confrontational manner. just saying.
In reality I do believe that a specific for the lone worker is required. and I also think we need to get the kids out last weekend of March... when teh snow is a whipping round the knees... 30th/31st .... there is also potential for some CSI stuff on a 16th century seige the weekend before. but I digress.
THat would be an interesting and positive exercise... for those that would like to see a profiling the specialist
I think we have it cracked. and there we can leave it.
the question is to fill it in or not to fill it in.
The data is there to use or not to use.
Though I still don't know what the data tells us... though that said, it does what archaeologists do best ( or used to before cutbacks) collect data that we don't know is useful yet.
You see how Doug can reply if asked questions in a less confrontational manner. just saying.
In reality I do believe that a specific for the lone worker is required. and I also think we need to get the kids out last weekend of March... when teh snow is a whipping round the knees... 30th/31st .... there is also potential for some CSI stuff on a 16th century seige the weekend before. but I digress.
Quote:If anyone wants to try their hand building their own survey I -and I'm sure Doug- would be happy to help with advice, it can be very interesting thing to do and get some really good data with which to make a positive difference.
THat would be an interesting and positive exercise... for those that would like to see a profiling the specialist