Listing Broadgate.. unthinking bureaucracy or what?

[Unitof1]

I am sure that bishopsgate which I think had a lot of excavation archaeology (possibly not all published) is somewhere the cynical use of heritage should not have prevailed in what ever it is that the planners think they are doing on behalf of the great british public. Demolishing buildings which presumably are viable for another 100 years I think is possibly not a sustainable use of resources and that it is being funded by a bank who all seem to have the run of our capital city is obscene sadness. Whats really wrong with the “city” is that it should be incorporated into a borough of London that has a resident population and not one governed by business representation. Business representation based on paying business rates I think went out for the rest of the country sometime in the 1960s. There again I also think that business rates should also be abolished in this virtual world-its not as though google pay them

as for eh listing 'unique' surely by being listed it then becomes un'unique'