21st March 2011, 10:42 AM
two points - which are not likely to be seen as constructive so i'm posting here
a condem 'big society' would have archaeology for free - cus plenty would do it (however badly)
heritage/archaeology is part of the environment so we should be thinking in terms of 'environmental protection' - training in, provision of, policing of, teaching of etc -
environmental concerns are acceptabe to the public - if the 38 campaign showed anything it was that the environment is treasured
a condem 'big society' would have archaeology for free - cus plenty would do it (however badly)
heritage/archaeology is part of the environment so we should be thinking in terms of 'environmental protection' - training in, provision of, policing of, teaching of etc -
environmental concerns are acceptabe to the public - if the 38 campaign showed anything it was that the environment is treasured