2nd November 2010, 03:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 2nd November 2010, 03:46 PM by Unitof1.)
Quote:[SIZE=3]English Heritage's input into planning extends far beyond simply providing archaeological advice to a couple of London boroughs.
[/SIZE]
News to me
does eh pay for the archaeological advice in a couple of London boroughs?
the only time I have had any involvement with eh and planning I had to tell them that they were holding the publics copy of an eia for a pipeline. It took them two weeks to find it. They were a statutory consultee and were able to respond with the comment that the cleaver people routing the pipeline had not put it through a scheduled monument-standard letter- which the eia people had already pointed out in the desktop and which I am sure the local not statutory consultee planning authority would have also spotted. I would be interested in any examples of their requirement that could not be undertaken by other authorities.I think that you will find that the nation is made up of local authoritituies.
Now eh do like to come out with planning like authority wibble here is a pointless jobs worth example
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/professional/advice/advice-by-topic/climate-change/renewable-energy/biomass-energy/
hows that work then? before farmer plants elephant grass younitof1 called in to undertake evaluation?
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=...47pzfW1Yeg
pointless waste of time- nice burocratic signiture
agree gwql about not returing to MSC YOPS, although they were not all tossers they soon become so when they carryied on without taking their degrees realising that it would always leave a chip on their shoulders
Reason: your past is my past