5th November 2008, 01:33 PM
HB (go on, be rude) Apart from there did not used to be administration charges and now there are so things have changed and could the charge not be used to pay for the nominated archaeologist to undertake the work but I just know I will get an irrelevant warning in terms of access conditions so its probably better to follow Drps lead on unreasonable third party dependence to which could be added reasonable monitoring and enforcement.
http://www.communities.gov.uk/publicatio...ircularuse
I have to admit that why isnât it seen that having to have an archaeologists for anything is unreasonable on the grounds that you cant do it your self.
I presume from Beamos preamble that the matter of this thread is still pre application with this condition but I wonder how the access condition would be worded and how would it be discharged
http://www.communities.gov.uk/publicatio...ircularuse
I have to admit that why isnât it seen that having to have an archaeologists for anything is unreasonable on the grounds that you cant do it your self.
I presume from Beamos preamble that the matter of this thread is still pre application with this condition but I wonder how the access condition would be worded and how would it be discharged