8th December 2005, 01:59 PM
I agree with Troll about the theoretical value of such a scheme, but also with others that it might not be practicable. See my post from yesterday on the IFA thread about who could actually do such monitoring.
Two specific questions have been raised above:
1. Who would they represent?
They would have to represent and be overseen by the curators.
2. What would they monitor ('standards' being too vague)
If they represent the curator, then they would be monitoring proper implementation of the agreed WSI and/or the curator's brief. IFA (or any other) standards would only come into it so far as they are referred to or defined in the WSI/brief.
They would explicitly not be monitoring the contract. That is the role of the client themselves, potentially through their consultant.
1man1desk
to let, fully furnished
Two specific questions have been raised above:
1. Who would they represent?
They would have to represent and be overseen by the curators.
2. What would they monitor ('standards' being too vague)
If they represent the curator, then they would be monitoring proper implementation of the agreed WSI and/or the curator's brief. IFA (or any other) standards would only come into it so far as they are referred to or defined in the WSI/brief.
They would explicitly not be monitoring the contract. That is the role of the client themselves, potentially through their consultant.
1man1desk
to let, fully furnished