1st February 2007, 10:04 PM
I am forever learning things here pal
So the 2005, 52 page document is originally a 2 page appendix in the 2004, 21 page document which it does not reference. I thought that it was a very lopsided affair
As the introduction says (2004)
âIt aims to clarify best practice without introducing any new requirements. It seeks to support the regulatory authorities by indicating what information and action is expected from parishes and cathedrals while they devise and commission works.â
(written by the regulatory authorities no doubt)
And in the bog section D2 it says
âAssertions by proposers of schemes that pre-consent evaluation is impossible should always be examined critically, and a distinction made between cases where this is true and those where proper procedures for assessing environmental impacts are being ignored.â
Well my instincts were there and I gave it a shot. it was post consent by the time I got it...
When I was kid I was taught by nuns. Their punishment for stopping me talking was to put chilli peppers on my tongue.
off to follow this
âCare of Cathedrals Measure (1990) it became a statutory requirement for each cathedral to have a consultant archaeologistâ please not noooooo consultant archaeologist defined by law
âarchaeological consultant" means a person who possesses such qualifications and expertise in archaeological matters as the Commission may recognise as appropriate;
and I presume the Commission is Cathedrals Fabric Commission -so this is the birthing position. I have an inkling that a lot of consultant archaeologists are not born this way. Must make them illegitimate.
M theres a bit of a difference between number 1s and number 2s
So the 2005, 52 page document is originally a 2 page appendix in the 2004, 21 page document which it does not reference. I thought that it was a very lopsided affair
As the introduction says (2004)
âIt aims to clarify best practice without introducing any new requirements. It seeks to support the regulatory authorities by indicating what information and action is expected from parishes and cathedrals while they devise and commission works.â
(written by the regulatory authorities no doubt)
And in the bog section D2 it says
âAssertions by proposers of schemes that pre-consent evaluation is impossible should always be examined critically, and a distinction made between cases where this is true and those where proper procedures for assessing environmental impacts are being ignored.â
Well my instincts were there and I gave it a shot. it was post consent by the time I got it...
When I was kid I was taught by nuns. Their punishment for stopping me talking was to put chilli peppers on my tongue.
off to follow this
âCare of Cathedrals Measure (1990) it became a statutory requirement for each cathedral to have a consultant archaeologistâ please not noooooo consultant archaeologist defined by law
âarchaeological consultant" means a person who possesses such qualifications and expertise in archaeological matters as the Commission may recognise as appropriate;
and I presume the Commission is Cathedrals Fabric Commission -so this is the birthing position. I have an inkling that a lot of consultant archaeologists are not born this way. Must make them illegitimate.
M theres a bit of a difference between number 1s and number 2s