1st February 2007, 07:16 PM
I have to say I am finding it difficult to reply to Unit of 1 and stay within the AUP.
I suggest Unit of 1 ought to do some more reading about Churchyard Archaeology.
Best practice for the situation he describes is as follows:
"(b) Trial pits for evaluation should only be required in
cases where there is archaeological potential other than
previous unspecified burying. Examples are where
previous exposures have shown that burials are likely to
be encountered, the site of demolished chapels or
monastic ranges, or where the configuration of the
stonework at the point of connection into the church has
potential sensitivity or raises unresolved questions."
Might I suggest that Unitof1 also pays some attention to contractual matters.
Peter
I suggest Unit of 1 ought to do some more reading about Churchyard Archaeology.
Best practice for the situation he describes is as follows:
"(b) Trial pits for evaluation should only be required in
cases where there is archaeological potential other than
previous unspecified burying. Examples are where
previous exposures have shown that burials are likely to
be encountered, the site of demolished chapels or
monastic ranges, or where the configuration of the
stonework at the point of connection into the church has
potential sensitivity or raises unresolved questions."
Might I suggest that Unitof1 also pays some attention to contractual matters.
Peter