22nd January 2007, 03:09 PM
On the grounds that Rescue still applies more than ever before you keep digging and fight to your last breath the parasites that donât think that there is anything there worth looking for.
So, as far as I can tell from the logic of your argument:
- no planning permission for any development anywhere should be given without an intrusive trial excavation; Yes- unless its scheduled
- no existing information on the presence/absence of archaeology, its nature or its layout should be taken into account in deciding whether to trial trench or in designing the trench layout; Any white space on the map has to be systematically at an adequate sample evaluated by trench-anything âknownâ should be excavated.
- no archaeological information that comes from sources other than digging a hole is worth considering. It is not worth considering if it in any way it reduces the requirement to evaluate by trench
putting the field back into field archaeologist
So, as far as I can tell from the logic of your argument:
- no planning permission for any development anywhere should be given without an intrusive trial excavation; Yes- unless its scheduled
- no existing information on the presence/absence of archaeology, its nature or its layout should be taken into account in deciding whether to trial trench or in designing the trench layout; Any white space on the map has to be systematically at an adequate sample evaluated by trench-anything âknownâ should be excavated.
- no archaeological information that comes from sources other than digging a hole is worth considering. It is not worth considering if it in any way it reduces the requirement to evaluate by trench
putting the field back into field archaeologist