8th January 2007, 02:36 PM
"
It is generally accepted that curators do not have legal powers to make developers choose from an 'approved list' of contractors. If follows that curators cannot be held to be at fault if the contractor chosen by the developer turns out to be incompetent.
"
Thanks for pointing that one out 1 man... it is important to highlight this...
One bit to had as well though is that is a developer employs a duff contractor... it will usually cost them time and money in the long run... Thats why we need a proper/robust scheme that ensures quality. (RAO is a potential ... but without adequate monitorisng or policing.. is not / shuld not be seen as a benchmark... wher we are all aware of RAOs who perhaps should set their sights lower... and non-RAOs who put others in the shade. (and visa versa)
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu
It is generally accepted that curators do not have legal powers to make developers choose from an 'approved list' of contractors. If follows that curators cannot be held to be at fault if the contractor chosen by the developer turns out to be incompetent.
"
Thanks for pointing that one out 1 man... it is important to highlight this...
One bit to had as well though is that is a developer employs a duff contractor... it will usually cost them time and money in the long run... Thats why we need a proper/robust scheme that ensures quality. (RAO is a potential ... but without adequate monitorisng or policing.. is not / shuld not be seen as a benchmark... wher we are all aware of RAOs who perhaps should set their sights lower... and non-RAOs who put others in the shade. (and visa versa)
"No job worth doing was ever done on time or under budget.."
Khufu