15th December 2006, 07:00 PM
Quote:quote:Originally posted by Unitof1
"That I used developer to describe statutory undertaker is probably a mistake as you seem to suggest that being the landowner or not is not relevant from a view of town and Country planning acts. "
Hi Unitof1,
No, I made a general point regarding the occasional overlap of the 'role' of developer and landowner, and that the developer normally funds commercial archaeological work, as you raised this as an issue with pipeline work.
à venuto dal deposito