24th February 2006, 01:12 PM
I heard about this as well I want it to stay in Lancaster, as thats where it was found as does the person who excavated it, or at least it should remain Britain to sell it and let it go abroad could set a dangerous precedent in my view allowing developers to take advatage of situations like is he looking to sell all the artefacts or just this one, if the developers did not budget correctly then it is there fault.
Its bad enough when others nations heritgae is sold legally or illegally, but it is something worth harrasing the culture minster about.
Keeep archaeology where it belongs. Keep it local.
May god go with you in all the dark places you must walk.
Its bad enough when others nations heritgae is sold legally or illegally, but it is something worth harrasing the culture minster about.
Keeep archaeology where it belongs. Keep it local.
May god go with you in all the dark places you must walk.