22nd June 2014, 10:45 AM
Is it just me, or is this Clause 25 thingy totally irrelevant when it comes to commercial archaeology? The fact that the client is paying you to dig on their land rather implies that they give you consent to dig on their land. If they haven't got the appropriate rights to operate on that land, well, rather more important laws and regulations come in to play...
I reserve the right to change my mind. It's called learning.