16th August 2013, 02:54 PM
i agree, and while the undercurrent remains this way, its the archaeology that suffers, with unknown amounts of material and information being lost to the politics and pride of heritage sector. I think that's why attempts like this are important, if its easy and cheap enough to do it, then the reasons for not doing it ie..budget, time, are out of the window, and we have half a chance of gaining some of the information and data which otherwise, would be lost.
for me its always about the archaeology, which is probably why im an non - archaeologically employed student
for me its always about the archaeology, which is probably why im an non - archaeologically employed student