Good lord, where do I start??? Nice to see that common sense is prevailing in at least one corner of the archaeological profession (i.e. bajr).
Re contractor lists, woe betide any individual / organisation that relied on being 'on the list' to get their work........whatever happened to marketing, reputation etc. etc.
Re the requirement for PMs to be MIfA, I am sure that CPAT could not reasonably exclude an individual who could demonstrate that they had equivalent experience etc.
It makes me want to quit my MIfA status in order to be able to challenge such stupidity.................it's becoming clear to me that the IfA (and FAME for that matter) are nothing more than collectives of self-serving blowhards who think they know better...........and don't get me started on the Southport Group.........or perhaps you think otherwise?
However, getting back to the title of the thread, no I don't think it is Restriction of Trade as it is unenforceable under law.
Re contractor lists, woe betide any individual / organisation that relied on being 'on the list' to get their work........whatever happened to marketing, reputation etc. etc.
Re the requirement for PMs to be MIfA, I am sure that CPAT could not reasonably exclude an individual who could demonstrate that they had equivalent experience etc.
It makes me want to quit my MIfA status in order to be able to challenge such stupidity.................it's becoming clear to me that the IfA (and FAME for that matter) are nothing more than collectives of self-serving blowhards who think they know better...........and don't get me started on the Southport Group.........or perhaps you think otherwise?
However, getting back to the title of the thread, no I don't think it is Restriction of Trade as it is unenforceable under law.