21st February 2013, 07:50 PM
(This post was last modified: 21st February 2013, 07:52 PM by GnomeKing.)
i am not your enemy - you are mis-venting.
OUR as in shared heritage -
as i say more rational decisions need to be taken regarding some collections - commercial companies should be expected to have already thought a lot about it, even if they don't make final decisions.
I have said before that De-accessioning needs serious thought - equally submissions should be considered in turns of their overall potentials > i agree no more cbm needed ! > or tile > many low grade ubiquitous and documented sherds could also go > as could some bone assemblages > sadly some written archival material is so generic it could simply be disposed of and a card index entry kept!
SO, much could go > BUT only to make room for well researched archaeological material of value (something which goes back to initial excavation decisions...)
BUT,
PLEASE,
spare us the Little Timmy line >>> the door for that complaint lies elsewhere...(with a 10 on it).
@MODERATORS : pls delete all this rubbish!!!!
OUR as in shared heritage -
as i say more rational decisions need to be taken regarding some collections - commercial companies should be expected to have already thought a lot about it, even if they don't make final decisions.
I have said before that De-accessioning needs serious thought - equally submissions should be considered in turns of their overall potentials > i agree no more cbm needed ! > or tile > many low grade ubiquitous and documented sherds could also go > as could some bone assemblages > sadly some written archival material is so generic it could simply be disposed of and a card index entry kept!
SO, much could go > BUT only to make room for well researched archaeological material of value (something which goes back to initial excavation decisions...)
BUT,
PLEASE,
spare us the Little Timmy line >>> the door for that complaint lies elsewhere...(with a 10 on it).
@MODERATORS : pls delete all this rubbish!!!!