16th February 2013, 10:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 16th February 2013, 10:53 PM by Unitof1.)
worthy possibly but a fiddler pays for the tune. I notice that the charter extract has no substinance, is there a caveat somewhere (apart from the implicitness of nationalisum) which say that all this moral high ground is dependant on an equal access, with the rearing of babies in incubators, to the trough of tax farming? or in lay mans terms- what? they have a right to dosh for ever from anybody they so care to name?
Let they who are worthy cast the first stone. This isnt a joke but should I deposit all my household rubbish with them as an archaeological archive?
Let they who are worthy cast the first stone. This isnt a joke but should I deposit all my household rubbish with them as an archaeological archive?
Quote:2 the landowner chooses to seek planning permission for a development which has an effect on the heritage (the nation's heritage) in which case the mitigation of the effects of the development involves making the results available to the public and the records constituting the preservation by record available in the long term through deposition in an accessible archive (such a requirement usually being written in the brief for a project).will have to work on this one, could you point me in the direction of statute in law, principle in constutution, a grandmother who used to swear that this was true, I would settle for a law of termodynaics.
Reason: your past is my past