2nd March 2013, 08:31 PM
Think the arguement they were promoting (but didn't bother explaining for some reason) was that the other evidence made it pretty likely the body was R3, and the 1-2% haplotype therefore made it 50-100 times even more likely...still an element of doubt though...}
...as bad/frustrating as C14 and isotope results, always that element of 'but'... :face-crying:
...as bad/frustrating as C14 and isotope results, always that element of 'but'... :face-crying: