27th December 2012, 09:40 AM
cant stand pottery experts or even any of the so called specialists. I think that any of the identification of the things found in excavation should be subject only to the curiosity of the excavator. They are the ones who descided to pick the stupid things up or is it that we think that a digger should only be able differentiate ceramic from stone. I think that the identification should be done by the excavator. If they think some bit of pot is medieval or roman and should be discarded I think that it should be up to them.-
particularly if it is in an evaluation.
Pity Mike Heaton does not still manage to incorporate copyrights into his vision for the selfemployed evaluator although he possibly starting to see the contractual importance of the concept of evaluation. Seems to me that the blinkhorns of this world would do better to differentiate so called reports between that which serves the requirments of evaluation and those that serve some requirment of excavation.
particularly if it is in an evaluation.
Pity Mike Heaton does not still manage to incorporate copyrights into his vision for the selfemployed evaluator although he possibly starting to see the contractual importance of the concept of evaluation. Seems to me that the blinkhorns of this world would do better to differentiate so called reports between that which serves the requirments of evaluation and those that serve some requirment of excavation.
Reason: your past is my past