4th August 2012, 11:23 PM
this subject is a right mess issint it. I think that we should start by saying that this is all about northern irish archaeology which is not the same as southern irist archaeology which probably makes it a lot worser than welsh, scotyish and probably on a par with angle archaeology. I still as yet have no idea about who is involved. Thanks for this Carrickavoy
Quote:Huh, a bit of snooping suggests it is all a bit more muddy then that. Perhaps your cynicism is correct on this occasion Uo1.but it would be nice to know which bit of mud slinging hit. Round my way councilors like to sell land to developers or have land near to developments which might have certaian inpacts on their leagcies. This case seems to have a "road service" which says that it did not know that there was an archaeological feature there even though it agreed to pay for an archaeological intervention there. The fact that some two bot minister is asking for an inquirey should only be taken to expect that it has nothing what so ever to do with archaeology. Where is the EIA for this scheme.......and hosty are you part of the say nothing conspiricy? seems that you are feeding us a lot of
Quote:I do not want to prejudice things just now.
Quote:I am itching to contact the company ... but know the staff are feeling battered and let down.so what this about how bad northern irish archaeology is. It realy is a stinker and it probably includes the minister, has the guy got a crb check?
Reason: your past is my past