30th July 2012, 05:03 PM
Unitof1 I think the engineering company is actually in charge of the archaeology. From what I can gather the site director was employed directly by the engineering company and the field-workers were sub-contracted in. Also from what I can gather, and what bajr is stating, the only reason the site is recorded in any form is because the staff went against the orders of their superiors. As far as I am aware this was a private company.