26th July 2012, 04:55 PM
Also, having more time available might not really solve the problem if the site has been drying out for a year and a half, two thirds of it has been machined away and the rest has dug without a proper record (judging by all the questions which mention "generally accepted practice in the profession").
I'm not familiar with the regulatory practice in Northern Ireland. Is it the case here that the Department of the Environment is acting as both client and curator, with the archaeologists working directly for the main site contractor?
I'm not familiar with the regulatory practice in Northern Ireland. Is it the case here that the Department of the Environment is acting as both client and curator, with the archaeologists working directly for the main site contractor?