2nd January 2012, 03:24 AM
In reply to Hosty:
Just got back from work and read your posting, expected the editing and was actually quite pleased you did because I knew I had pushed the boat out (in publishing in a public forum) quite far.
The situation seems to have been resolved as welfare on the site has improved.
The staff were obviously mis-informed about the situation for the last 5 weeks or so. A cynic might conclude that it only improved because certain folk monitor the BAJR site. I'm not one of those people, I have great faith in the philanthropic endeavour of employers within archaeology. After all, we must be able to trust them, they're for the most part, archaeologists themselves who have developed an interesting insight into the economics of the commercial archaeological industry.
My sources were pretty happy initially for me to publicise the situation but I'm afraid fear has made them ask me to shut up. Satire, I believe is the answer.
Toodeloo and Happy New Year.
Just got back from work and read your posting, expected the editing and was actually quite pleased you did because I knew I had pushed the boat out (in publishing in a public forum) quite far.
The situation seems to have been resolved as welfare on the site has improved.
The staff were obviously mis-informed about the situation for the last 5 weeks or so. A cynic might conclude that it only improved because certain folk monitor the BAJR site. I'm not one of those people, I have great faith in the philanthropic endeavour of employers within archaeology. After all, we must be able to trust them, they're for the most part, archaeologists themselves who have developed an interesting insight into the economics of the commercial archaeological industry.
My sources were pretty happy initially for me to publicise the situation but I'm afraid fear has made them ask me to shut up. Satire, I believe is the answer.
Toodeloo and Happy New Year.