1st December 2011, 10:09 PM
The precept is mostly down to trying to manage the nature of the industry in your local area.
The problem is when a relationship defines an industry, or a industry defines itself.
So for me the question is not so much what role determines the standards but rather is this standard external to the industry denoting commercial bystanders to any given contract (quality assured)
Whether the role is externally applied by a supported body which provides a subsistence base to an organisation where the level of support provided is basis of formulating a 'pushed' judgement, or a body which is of commercially independent means, which enable it to stand on any given basis.
Like wise there is the further option of self assement, where you could be self certifying or mutually involved in the process of standards.
So the question comes down to what is right for the conditions and a given recomendation, to provide fertile ground for an active and responsive industry.
The nature of the industry however determines the capacity in the form of interested parties for products, or likewise a commitment to a a direction.
So if no-one comes up with an array of products and no-one agrees, it would be a nose dive
If people superficially agree just to play along, its a nose dive
So the basis to establish both the nature of the industry conditions and the orientation stems from a degree of agreement with regards to agreement.
Central standards, local standards, personal standards, professional standards could all be correct but the nature of a professiona and an idustry which would strive to build a purpose and direction requires an application of a standard and thus an agreement, without thinking about it, or you could think about it and come to an agreement.
If your arguing to make your box, then you live with it.
If you argue your situation, thats personal.
If you argue a grand scheme, then you accept it.
And if everyone you imagined would support your argument is nowhere to be seen, then you can muster the same support again from those who turned out, or said I do appologise.
Then I suppose some sports are more important than other sports.
(personally)
A body that exists has a better chance than a lone voice on the wind upon planning legislation, unless you knowsome in high places on your side, but then thats just you, not an industry.
The problem is when a relationship defines an industry, or a industry defines itself.
So for me the question is not so much what role determines the standards but rather is this standard external to the industry denoting commercial bystanders to any given contract (quality assured)
Whether the role is externally applied by a supported body which provides a subsistence base to an organisation where the level of support provided is basis of formulating a 'pushed' judgement, or a body which is of commercially independent means, which enable it to stand on any given basis.
Like wise there is the further option of self assement, where you could be self certifying or mutually involved in the process of standards.
So the question comes down to what is right for the conditions and a given recomendation, to provide fertile ground for an active and responsive industry.
The nature of the industry however determines the capacity in the form of interested parties for products, or likewise a commitment to a a direction.
So if no-one comes up with an array of products and no-one agrees, it would be a nose dive
If people superficially agree just to play along, its a nose dive
So the basis to establish both the nature of the industry conditions and the orientation stems from a degree of agreement with regards to agreement.
Central standards, local standards, personal standards, professional standards could all be correct but the nature of a professiona and an idustry which would strive to build a purpose and direction requires an application of a standard and thus an agreement, without thinking about it, or you could think about it and come to an agreement.
If your arguing to make your box, then you live with it.
If you argue your situation, thats personal.
If you argue a grand scheme, then you accept it.
And if everyone you imagined would support your argument is nowhere to be seen, then you can muster the same support again from those who turned out, or said I do appologise.
Then I suppose some sports are more important than other sports.
(personally)
A body that exists has a better chance than a lone voice on the wind upon planning legislation, unless you knowsome in high places on your side, but then thats just you, not an industry.