15th September 2011, 12:44 AM
(This post was last modified: 15th September 2011, 12:51 AM by Unitof1.)
Quote:[SIZE=3]1. Finally, for the archaeological cost to be just under 30% of the total project cost suggests that either something was very wrong with communicating the rising cost to the developers, or that the developers were willing to make the sacrifice.
[/SIZE]
I think it means that we-self apointed archaeologists- are masters of the univers
Quote:[SIZE=3]Strip, Map and Sample is an incredibly effective method of dealing with archaeological remains on a large siteWhy restrict this to large sites, how about insy wincy little ones which have never had an evaluation. Like watching briefs for little old ladies.- take pictures of the clouds
[/SIZE]
It would be interesting to “read” what the “recommendations” were made from the
Quote:[SIZE=3]documentary research and archaeological field evaluations, including geophysical surveys and small-scale trial trench excavationswere they –“small scale”=3milliom for a site which nobody wants
[/SIZE]
I smell pension grabbers…living with pension grabbers,,,, born of pension grabbers
what is an evaluation-[SIZE=3]eh..... they run off to read map2[/SIZE]
-but I would rather know what the tendering process was for this [SIZE=7]farss[/SIZE]
Reason: your past is my past