25th July 2011, 09:22 AM
Marcus Brody Wrote:But if they don't win the contracts, the diggers will be out of a job anyway, and will be moaning about those lazy fekkers back in the office being incapable of finding enough new sites to keep the staff employed. I don't want to see anyone being exploited, I don't think diggers should have to travel hundreds of miles a day for buttons, but if the firm doesn't win new jobs, the diggers will be out of work anyway.
the problem lies in there being too many firms undercutting to win these contracts. it wouldnt matter to most diggers who they were working for as long as the pay and conditions were appropriate. in fact contracts could be longer because more would be being dug rather than evermore less.
you know where the answer lies marcus - but i dont know why you resist
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers