26th April 2010, 11:29 AM
http://www.bajrfed.co.uk/showthread.php?...ight=italy
as you can see I have kissed this subject to death before
You lot are easily unimpressed -as soon as landownership and archaeology come up. You are all probably working on a pipeline somewhere moaning about overtime rates, blaming it all on the construction industry and not giving two hoots that the code used to say that an archaeologist should
And if you did what it says On obligations to other parties you lot would be paid probably two to ten times what you are getting now but then you are addicted to PAYE with absolutly no responsibility for your copyright
boom boom
pension grabbers need not reapply
as you can see I have kissed this subject to death before
You lot are easily unimpressed -as soon as landownership and archaeology come up. You are all probably working on a pipeline somewhere moaning about overtime rates, blaming it all on the construction industry and not giving two hoots that the code used to say that an archaeologist should
[SIZE=1]
[SIZE=1]25 A member embarking upon fieldwork will secure the permission
of the landowner and tenant as appropriate, and of any others
with rights or responsibilities for the land and its safekeepingQuote:
[B][SIZE=1][SIZE=1]On obligations to other parties[/SIZE]
[SIZE=1]25 A member embarking upon fieldwork will secure the permission
of the landowner and tenant as appropriate, and of any others
[/SIZE]
[/SIZE][/SIZE][/B]
And if you did what it says On obligations to other parties you lot would be paid probably two to ten times what you are getting now but then you are addicted to PAYE with absolutly no responsibility for your copyright
boom boom
pension grabbers need not reapply