1st December 2009, 03:56 PM
Don't worry, I wasn't saying this was a 'have a go at the IfA' thread - I think I was making the point that it's not just the IfA that should be looked to for solutions - or for discussions or transparency.
I can agree with that. And would also make (another) point that I make a lot. (anyone asleep yet! Sorry!) Democratic bodies - you've got to be a member of the body to have a vote and a say. If you are a member, you can stand for Council and the committees. If you want an organisation that represents all parts of archaeology, all parts of archaeology need to be engaged with it in one way or another...... (Can I have a 'power to the people' smiley with a cap and a raised fist please??? }
)
BAJR Host Wrote:A strong IfA and a sense of cooperation and transparency.
I can agree with that. And would also make (another) point that I make a lot. (anyone asleep yet! Sorry!) Democratic bodies - you've got to be a member of the body to have a vote and a say. If you are a member, you can stand for Council and the committees. If you want an organisation that represents all parts of archaeology, all parts of archaeology need to be engaged with it in one way or another...... (Can I have a 'power to the people' smiley with a cap and a raised fist please??? }
)