23rd October 2005, 06:50 PM
Quote:quote:Originally posted by troll
I am yet to read a BAJR post where non-degree archaeologists are undervalued or belittled in any way.
Thank goddness for BAJR! About a year ago I posted a mail to another archaeological discussion forum (also begins with B), where I suggested (tongue in cheek) that any form of book learning was anathema to those of us in the profession who had come through the MSC scheme. I received several indignant mails one suggesting that it was about time I started looking for another job because I was obviously totally unsuitable for archaeology. Another suggested I was undermining the efforts of the university system by suggesting that archaeology could possibly be undertaken by non-qualified practioners.
I totally agree with the sentiments of Troll and Beer Beast, but actually do wonder if there isn't still prejudice in the wider archaeological world. How many archaeological job adverts do you see for example that state 'degree essential and at least 6 months expeience', whilst countless years experience of a non-qualified archaeological practioner would probably be lucky to get as far as the Personnel Office rubbish bin, never mind a shortlist.