9th April 2009, 11:08 AM
Since April last year all advertising had to be 100% true before this you were allowed "advertisers puff" I think that was the right term. So for example consider this:
"advances the practice of archaeology and allied disciplines by promoting professional standards and ethics for conserving, managing, understanding and promoting enjoyment of heritage"
Is this 100% true and is it the whole truth or is it debateable?
Similarly consider this:
HOW LONG WILL ARCHAEOLOGY DELAY YOUR DEVELOPMENT?
WILL YOU GET LISTED BUILDING CONSENT?
What will it cost? Will planning permission be refused?
How do you manage the risk?
For a quote to find the solution
and for advice you can understand
Contact
"The archaeology at Gilberts Farm was the model of best practice"
English Heritage
"Thank you for the report on the cart shed at The Bell, Aldworth. I've had a look through this and I think that you should be congratulated on an excellent report. This is the standard that we hope to see for all building recording in the district"
Duncan Coe, Archaeological Officer, West Berkshire Council
"The report is absolutely fascinating"
Mark Newton, Chief Executive Officer, Worcestershire County Cricket Club
Again is this true or is it debateable the second one is from my own web site http://www.historicenvironment.co.uk . I would suggest that getting advertising 100% right is very difficult. It is put easier to criticise that it is to out the material togethar. The use of the term one man band is patronising and without seeing what is present (email me a link and I will give you a view we cannot comment. There are many positives from working out of your house so yes at present I think you are being "a bit ungenerous, bitter, and lacking in imagination?"
IF any body fins anything misleading on my web site please let me know.
Dr Peter Wardle
"advances the practice of archaeology and allied disciplines by promoting professional standards and ethics for conserving, managing, understanding and promoting enjoyment of heritage"
Is this 100% true and is it the whole truth or is it debateable?
Similarly consider this:
HOW LONG WILL ARCHAEOLOGY DELAY YOUR DEVELOPMENT?
WILL YOU GET LISTED BUILDING CONSENT?
What will it cost? Will planning permission be refused?
How do you manage the risk?
For a quote to find the solution
and for advice you can understand
Contact
"The archaeology at Gilberts Farm was the model of best practice"
English Heritage
"Thank you for the report on the cart shed at The Bell, Aldworth. I've had a look through this and I think that you should be congratulated on an excellent report. This is the standard that we hope to see for all building recording in the district"
Duncan Coe, Archaeological Officer, West Berkshire Council
"The report is absolutely fascinating"
Mark Newton, Chief Executive Officer, Worcestershire County Cricket Club
Again is this true or is it debateable the second one is from my own web site http://www.historicenvironment.co.uk . I would suggest that getting advertising 100% right is very difficult. It is put easier to criticise that it is to out the material togethar. The use of the term one man band is patronising and without seeing what is present (email me a link and I will give you a view we cannot comment. There are many positives from working out of your house so yes at present I think you are being "a bit ungenerous, bitter, and lacking in imagination?"
IF any body fins anything misleading on my web site please let me know.
Dr Peter Wardle