8th April 2009, 05:13 PM
I'm confused on this. Their website says that the excavation is to 'safeguard archaeological interests in the face of development', and then in the next sentance says that it is 'not development led'.
also David said: "This would never get past either the IfA or the local planning if it was substituting non professionals with free muscle."
not sure about local government, but its not one for the IfA. They are not an RO and none of their staff are members.
also David said: "This would never get past either the IfA or the local planning if it was substituting non professionals with free muscle."
not sure about local government, but its not one for the IfA. They are not an RO and none of their staff are members.