17th March 2009, 11:09 AM
David you miss the point.
This is about how a planning application will affect an "organisation" and the premises they occupy. Our help has been asked for and thus I think it perfectly correct that people are told the full facts of the situation. David said
"A magazine, publications, lectures, formal training, trips, fieldschool excavations etc...
Should that be knocked?"
I am not saying what they do is not good or the quality of their work is bad. I am not saying they do not having a legitimate point. I am asking that the full facts are revealed. I repeat my question who actually owns the building?
Peter
This is about how a planning application will affect an "organisation" and the premises they occupy. Our help has been asked for and thus I think it perfectly correct that people are told the full facts of the situation. David said
"A magazine, publications, lectures, formal training, trips, fieldschool excavations etc...
Should that be knocked?"
I am not saying what they do is not good or the quality of their work is bad. I am not saying they do not having a legitimate point. I am asking that the full facts are revealed. I repeat my question who actually owns the building?
Peter