14th November 2008, 08:18 AM
Hi Bob,
As you say, the NVQ in Archaeological Practice sets out a framework to which specific learning and development can be related, and assessed as contributing towards a qualification. But I think what I am getting in asking this question stems from the observation that sometimes training for field archaeologists is discussed in terms of acquiring technical skills, e.g. using an EDM competently, compiling a site matrix.
Of course those skills are important. But I think that sometimes there is too narrow a concept of training and development for field archaeologists, which needs to include the development of academic skills. Experienced field archaeologists, with degrees in archaeology, need opportunities to study the broader academic context of the sites they have spent a lot of time excavating. As you suggest Bob, this type of training could be delivered effectively by universities, but it isn't much at the moment.
I believe that training for archaeologists at all stages of the profession should include more than technical and generic managerial skills, and perhaps that opinion is hard to disagree with. I am interested in how strongly people agree.
Hal Dalwood
Bad archaeologist, worse husband
As you say, the NVQ in Archaeological Practice sets out a framework to which specific learning and development can be related, and assessed as contributing towards a qualification. But I think what I am getting in asking this question stems from the observation that sometimes training for field archaeologists is discussed in terms of acquiring technical skills, e.g. using an EDM competently, compiling a site matrix.
Of course those skills are important. But I think that sometimes there is too narrow a concept of training and development for field archaeologists, which needs to include the development of academic skills. Experienced field archaeologists, with degrees in archaeology, need opportunities to study the broader academic context of the sites they have spent a lot of time excavating. As you suggest Bob, this type of training could be delivered effectively by universities, but it isn't much at the moment.
I believe that training for archaeologists at all stages of the profession should include more than technical and generic managerial skills, and perhaps that opinion is hard to disagree with. I am interested in how strongly people agree.
Hal Dalwood
Bad archaeologist, worse husband